Draconian Forum

Go Back   Draconian Forum > Dragons! > General (Dragons)
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

General (Dragons) Discussions about all other Dragons or multiple dragons.

View Poll Results: what'd you think of the series?
sucks monkey 3 15.79%
awsome 12 63.16%
idk, I never read it 4 21.05%
Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-02-2008, 05:25 PM   #21
dragonfiddler
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2
dragonfiddler is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Dragonology was the first book that got me into dragons. I think its a good starter, but after a while, they get kind of little kiddy. As a first dragon book, I think it is great, but after you research more, online or in other books, it becomes rather lame. It did get me interested in dragons though
dragonfiddler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 10:58 PM   #22
the great magician
Baby Dragon
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3
the great magician is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Books are better

The internet is not always the 'best' because some random with know knowledge of the history of dragons can write a load of rubbish about dragons on the internet. You have to find the right book. I got several books on the legends and beliefs of dragons from different cultures ect. Dragons a Natural History is very good and I suggest it. Dragonology is brilliant starter to generate a young generation of dragon lovers. The book Dragonology is for fun, to create an imagination for younger audiance and it does relate to some truth about dragon legends such as teh Wyvern, chinese dragons.

There was an actual report that scientists may of found dragon remains and they found actual rocks can can be used as fuel to generate fire that dragons could use. We havent discovered all the places.
Articles are good as well I read an artcle on actual scientific facts about these dragons.

The interent is fun as well but when we talk of accuracy well the internet can be just as silly, innacurate as a childs book.
liberatedragon I disagree about that books are only for children when they do not use the internet because you use less brains and imagination to search the internet. The internet is fantastic but it is best to have a balance.

Last edited by the great magician : 10-06-2009 at 11:10 PM.
the great magician is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.